NEW DELHI: “Not few. A storm is coming,” CJP spokesperson Saurav Das on Saturday after Delhi Police detained a few protesters who had begun gathering ahead of the CJP’s Jantar Mantar 2.0 protest.Das reposted a news agency ANI’s post on X reporting the detentions and responded with the remark, suggesting that more people could join the protest.The proposed demonstration has been called over alleged irregularities in electoral rolls, with protesters demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.Meanwhile, YouTuber Dhruv Rathee was reportedly detained by Gurgaon Police on Saturday morning ahead of the protest. Sources said police personnel in plain clothes detained him after he refused to heed their advice not to attend the demonstration.A Gurgaon police officer said police had tried to persuade Rathee not to join the protest, citing prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in Delhi and the lack of permission for the gathering. The officer said Rathee had continued to post on social media that he would attend the protest.Gurgaon Police have also placed several Congress workers and members of other political parties under house arrest.Earlier, Das had urged people to unite to protect democracy and reclaim the country ahead of the party’s Jantar Mantar 2.0 protest.In a post on X, Das described the protest as a fight to reclaim the country, save democracy and secure the future of Gen-Z. He urged people to gather at Jantar Mantar and said the movement would continue until a corruption-free system was ensured.Das also alleged that Delhi Police had exposed his phone number while circulating documents related to the party’s previous protest and a letter denying permission for the proposed demonstration at Jantar Mantar. He said he had received more than 300 calls and numerous WhatsApp messages within an hour.In another post on X, Das alleged that his number had been leaked as part of what he described as a possible coordinated campaign. He also criticised media organisations for sharing the documents without redacting his number, saying they had circulated the material without taking basic precautions to protect his privacy.